M1: Discussion Forum 1: Why does reporting on a response’s limitations and flaws give a story more authority and credibility, not less?

Reporting the limitations and flaws of a response enhances its credibility and authority, as it demonstrates transparency, impartiality, and journalistic quality. By acknowledging and addressing these weaknesses, a commitment to truth and informational integrity is showcased, thereby strengthening the reader's confidence in the accuracy of the content. Furthermore, by providing a balanced and comprehensive perspective, it allows the audience to make more informed decisions and gain a deeper understanding of the topics discussed, thereby enriching the credibility and relevance of the story.